Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Progressive Conservative
Target Entity: Progressive_Conservative_Party_of_Canada
Preceding Context: The inclusion of a charter of rights in the Constitution Act was a much-debated issue. Trudeau spoke on television in October 1980, and announced his intention to constitutionalize a bill of rights that would include fundamental freedoms, democratic guarantees, freedom of movement, legal rights, equality and language rights. He did not want a notwithstanding clause. While his proposal gained popular support, provincial leaders opposed the potential limits on their powers. The federal
Succeeding Context: opposition feared liberal bias among judges, should courts be called upon to enforce rights. Additionally, the British Parliament cited their right to uphold Canada's old form of government. At a suggestion of the Conservatives, Trudeau's government thus agreed to a committee of Senators and MPs to further examine the bill of rights as well as the patriation plan. During this time, 90 hours were spent on the bill of rights alone, all filmed for television, while civil rights experts and advocacy groups put forward their perceptions on the Charter's flaws and omissions and how to remedy them. As Canada had a parliamentary system of government, and as judges were perceived not to have enforced rights well in the past, it was questioned whether the courts should be named as the enforcers of the Charter, as Trudeau wanted. Conservatives argued that elected politicians should be trusted instead. It was eventually decided that the responsibility should go to the courts. At the urging of civil libertarians, judges could even now exclude evidence in trials if acquired in breach of Charter rights in certain circumstances, something the Charter was not originally going to provide for. As the process continued, more features were added to the Charter, including equality rights for people with disabilities, more sex equality guarantees and recognition of Canada's multiculturalism. The limitations clause was also reworded to focus less on the importance of parliamentary government and more on justifiability of limits in free societies; the latter logic was more in line with rights developments around the world after World War II.
Paragraph Title: null
Source Page: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-3.611137728994516	0
wordnet_event_100029378	-2.1794767210457353	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	2.0634669399851977	1
wordnet_nongovernmental_organization_108009834	-2.1563159008911104	0
wordnet_unit_108189659	-3.3727451774521433	0
wordnet_institution_108053576	-0.7933701102737627	0
wordnet_musical_organization_108246613	-3.7840989242778593	0
wordnet_enterprise_108056231	-2.822407351918872	0
wordnet_association_108049401	-2.5937504598318184	0
wordnet_polity_108050385	-2.3418846180469397	0
wordnet_party_108256968	0.869651654760739	1
wordnet_force_108208016	-2.2430726494192927	0
wordnet_company_108187033	-2.077008510495773	0
wordnet_deputation_108402442	-2.062712551637	0
wordnet_union_108233056	-1.9865072560435908	0
wordnet_alliance_108293982	-1.0554370858325774	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-2.6842428249950063	0
yagoGeoEntity	-3.0305472737386645	0