Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Eleventh Amendment
Target Entity: Eleventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Preceding Context: Scalia has taken a broad view of the
Succeeding Context: , which bars certain lawsuits against states in the federal courts. In his 1989 dissent in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., Scalia stated that there was no intent on the part of the Framers to have the states surrender any sovereign immunity, and that the case that provoked the Eleventh Amendment, Chisholm v. Georgia, came as a surprise to them. Professor Ralph Rossum, who wrote a survey of Scalia's constitutional views, suggests that the justice's view of the Eleventh Amendment is actually contradictory to the language of the Amendment.
Paragraph Title: Federalism
Source Page: Antonin Scalia

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-2.4409741495352137	0
wordnet_event_100029378	1.2881205140818932	1
wordnet_act_100030358	1.8940619038395647	1
wordnet_action_100037396	1.459029777689619	1
wordnet_change_100191142	1.5045112633483038	1
wordnet_change_of_state_100199130	1.2815506783579362	1
wordnet_termination_100209943	-1.6021921379846338	0
wordnet_beginning_100235435	-1.6429621584355998	0
wordnet_motion_100279835	-1.4566538557472415	0
wordnet_motion_100331950	-1.1478989378917217	0
wordnet_activity_100407535	-2.1991277478602957	0
wordnet_speech_act_107160883	-1.8077332864673346	0
wordnet_group_action_101080366	-0.8250546969512806	0
wordnet_communication_106252138	-1.7866753022855388	0
wordnet_social_event_107288639	-2.4135262286945727	0
wordnet_happening_107283608	-1.421140906067407	0
wordnet_group_action_101080366	-0.8718493616315866	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	-1.7090759818544794	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-2.258113695127823	0
yagoGeoEntity	-1.707045163314292	0