Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Direct Marketing Association
Target Entity: Direct_Marketing_Association_\u0028USA\u0029
Preceding Context: The ACLU's position on spam is considered controversial by a broad cross-section of political points of view. In 2000, Marvin Johnson, a legislative counsel for the ACLU, stated that proposed anti-spam legislation infringed on free speech by denying anonymity and by forcing spam to be labeled as such: "Standardized labeling is compelled speech." He also stated, "It's relatively simple to click and delete." The debate found the ACLU joining with the
Succeeding Context: and the Center for Democracy and Technology in criticizing a bipartisan bill in the House of Representatives in 2000. As early as 1997 the ACLU had taken a strong position that nearly all spam legislation was improper, although it has supported "opt-out" requirements in some cases. The ACLU opposed the 2003 CAN-SPAM act suggesting that it could have a on speech in cyberspace.
Paragraph Title: 1990 to 2000
Source Page: American Civil Liberties Union

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-1.1576502996513962	0
wordnet_event_100029378	-1.4454277641224786	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	1.5366857355184471	1
wordnet_nongovernmental_organization_108009834	-1.5678284742202295	0
wordnet_unit_108189659	-1.5206150209330058	0
wordnet_institution_108053576	-1.6296884221666361	0
wordnet_musical_organization_108246613	-1.5905592531544714	0
wordnet_enterprise_108056231	-1.9792424398889221	0
wordnet_association_108049401	-1.5745721142816482	0
wordnet_polity_108050385	-1.831946091133187	0
wordnet_party_108256968	-1.4129004089737889	0
wordnet_force_108208016	-1.8307246465112665	0
wordnet_company_108187033	-1.6651613173439697	0
wordnet_deputation_108402442	-1.59063735294593	0
wordnet_union_108233056	-0.9691897420167587	0
wordnet_alliance_108293982	-1.2800597022200675	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-1.8673829288824744	0
yagoGeoEntity	-1.7055903995583261	0