Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Kepler’s
Target Entity: Johannes_Kepler
Preceding Context: In the late 17th and early 18th centuries, the Cartesian mechanical tradition was challenged by another philosophical tradition established by the Cambridge University Physicist and mathematician Isaac Newton. Where Descartes held that all motions should be explained with respect to the immediate force exerted by corpuscles, Newton chose to describe universal motion with reference to a set of fundamental mathematical principles: his three laws of motion and the law of gravitation, which he introduced in his 1687 work Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Using these principles, Newton removed the idea that objects followed paths determined by natural shapes (such as
Succeeding Context: idea that planets moved naturally in ellipses), and instead demonstrated that not only regularly observed paths, but all the future motions of any body could be deduced mathematically based on knowledge of their existing motion, their mass, and the forces acting upon them. However, observed celestial motions did not precisely conform to a Newtonian treatment, and Newton, who was also deeply interested in theology, imagined that God intervened to ensure the continued stability of the solar system.
Paragraph Title: Newtonian motion versus Cartesian motion
Source Page: History of physics

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-1.7080701414857697	0
wordnet_event_100029378	-1.528142299137564	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	-1.4774413459456943	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-0.6078896944572717	0
yagoGeoEntity	-1.6392405228713587	0