Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: European Court of Human Rights
Target Entity: European_Court_of_Human_Rights
Preceding Context: The United Kingdom suspends suffrage of some but not all prisoners. For example, civil prisoners sentenced for nonpayment of fines can vote. Prior to the judgment in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) convicted prisoners had the right to vote in law but without assistance by prison authorities voting was unavailable to prisoners. In Hirst, the
Succeeding Context: ruled that First Protocol Article 3 requires Member States to proactively support voting by authorized inmates. In the UK this policy is under review.
Paragraph Title: In the UK
Source Page: Disfranchisement

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-2.6376469849619713	0
wordnet_event_100029378	-1.9434561935301302	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	0.6946581727052957	1
wordnet_nongovernmental_organization_108009834	-1.2463682853159956	0
wordnet_unit_108189659	-1.748831588260344	0
wordnet_institution_108053576	-2.2724995974003654	0
wordnet_musical_organization_108246613	-1.4694284846043364	0
wordnet_enterprise_108056231	-1.6429718154566877	0
wordnet_association_108049401	-1.6459531089508808	0
wordnet_polity_108050385	-1.1118195463354383	0
wordnet_party_108256968	-1.3165754802973597	0
wordnet_force_108208016	-1.0025030879783312	0
wordnet_company_108187033	-1.3816017876147495	0
wordnet_deputation_108402442	-1.3800993574881415	0
wordnet_union_108233056	-1.3842748089227754	0
wordnet_alliance_108293982	-0.983188044434801	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-2.5583765230394153	0
yagoGeoEntity	-1.7667648911261806	0