Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: 85
Target Entity: Interstate_85
Preceding Context: The Court held that Congress acted well within its jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce clause in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, thereby upholding the act's Title II in question. While it might have been possible for Congress to pursue other methods for abolishing racial discrimination, the way in which Congress did so, according to the Court, was perfectly valid. It found no merit in the arguments pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment, finding it hard to conceive that such an Amendment might possibly be applicable in restraining civil rights legislation. Having observed that 75% of the Heart of Atlanta Motel's clientele came from out-of-state, and that it was strategically located near Interstates 75 and
Succeeding Context: as well as two major U.S. Highways, the Court found that the business clearly affected interstate commerce. As such, it therefore upheld the permanent injunction issued by the District Court, and required the Heart of Atlanta Motel to receive business from clientele of all races.
Paragraph Title: Decision
Source Page: Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

Ground Truth Types:

|---wordnet_entity_100001740
|  |---wordnet_artifact_100021939
|  |  |---wordnet_way_104564698
|  |  |  |---wordnet_road_104096066
|  |  |  |  |---wordnet_road_104096066_rest
|  |---yagoGeoEntity
|  |  |---wordnet_way_104564698
|  |  |  |---wordnet_road_104096066
|  |  |  |  |---wordnet_road_104096066_rest

Predicted Types:

TypeConfidenceDecision
wordnet_artifact_100021939-0.361404680836061 0
wordnet_event_100029378-1.7331331585165721 0
wordnet_organization_108008335-1.289322563830208 0
wordnet_person_100007846-0.27574006561305614 0
yagoGeoEntity-0.6820882031168927 0
|---wordnet_entity_100001740
|  |---wordnet_artifact_100021939
|  |---wordnet_event_100029378
|  |---wordnet_organization_108008335
|  |---wordnet_person_100007846
|  |---yagoGeoEntity