Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Supreme Court
Target Entity: Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Preceding Context: In Radovich v. National Football League, the
Succeeding Context: ruled in 1957 in favor of Radovich. Furthermore, the court declared the NFL was subject to antitrust laws. The implications from the Court's ruling were that the legality of the draft and of the NFL's reserve clause was dubious. Furthermore, the Court delineated a disparity in American professional sports which the Court said was "unrealistic, inconsistent, or illogical"; professional baseball was exempt from antitrust laws, but other professional sports were not. The Court suggested it was Congress's responsibility to legislate uniformity across all of professional sports. Congress immediately scheduled hearings on the ramifications of the ruling. Bell pressed a case in the media for the NFL being legislatively granted an exemption from antitrust regulations. Bell registered himself as a Congressional lobbyist and then claimed to the media that the NFL was a sport and not a business.
Paragraph Title: null
Source Page: Bert Bell

Ground Truth Types:

Predicted Types:

Type	Confidence	Decision
wordnet_artifact_100021939	-0.715989868260527	0
wordnet_event_100029378	-2.008919030404826	0
wordnet_organization_108008335	-2.5036907401902058	0
wordnet_person_100007846	-0.8280295715911616	0
yagoGeoEntity	0.3488474047516496	1
wordnet_location_100027167	-0.8855611383835194	0
wordnet_structure_104341686	-0.652781116577311	0
wordnet_facility_103315023	-1.323420512163686	0
wordnet_body_of_water_109225146	-2.9700135208839797	0
wordnet_geological_formation_109287968	-2.807724211274335	0
wordnet_way_104564698	-1.8392073249449772	0
wordnet_land_109334396	-3.034842855899493	0