Classifier Instance:

Anchor text: Microsoft v. Harmony Computers
Target Entity: Microsoft_Corp\u002e_v\u002e_Harmony_Comps\u002e_\u0026_Elecs\u002e\u002c_Inc\u002e
Preceding Context: The enforceability of an EULA depends on several factors, one of them being the court in which the case is heard. Some courts that have addressed the validity of the shrinkwrap license agreements have found some EULAs to be invalid, characterizing them as contracts of adhesion, unconscionable, and/or unacceptable pursuant to the U.C.C. —see, for instance, Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology, Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.. Other courts have determined that the shrinkwrap license agreement is valid and enforceable: see ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg,
Succeeding Context: , Novell v. Network Trade Center, and Ariz. Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. may have some bearing as well. No court has ruled on the validity of EULAs generally; decisions are limited to particular provisions and terms.
Paragraph Title: Enforceability of EULAs in the United States
Source Page: End-user license agreement

Ground Truth Types:

|---wordnet_entity_100001740
|  |---wordnet_event_100029378
|  |  |---wordnet_act_100030358
|  |  |  |---wordnet_group_action_101080366
|  |  |  |  |---wordnet_group_action_101080366_rest
|  |  |---wordnet_group_action_101080366
|  |  |  |---wordnet_group_action_101080366_rest

Predicted Types:

TypeConfidenceDecision
wordnet_artifact_100021939-1.8507441722547369 0
wordnet_event_100029378-1.2088326366131847 0
wordnet_organization_108008335-1.0308109827057772 0
wordnet_person_100007846-2.4218422831260527 0
yagoGeoEntity-1.166718116976165 0
|---wordnet_entity_100001740
|  |---wordnet_artifact_100021939
|  |---wordnet_event_100029378
|  |---wordnet_organization_108008335
|  |---wordnet_person_100007846
|  |---yagoGeoEntity